What is MDR that is being proposed for UPI transactions, who pays the final cost? Explained


What is MDR that is being proposed for UPI transactions, who pays the final cost? Explained
If an MDR is introduced in the future it will only be applicable to a limited category of merchant transactions with the rate being nominal

Unified Payments Interface or UPI transactions have become an important backbone of the digital payments economy in India. With wide adoption and transactions running into several lakh crore every month, UPI is an important payments enabler for the common man, small and big businesses.But the service which has remained free so far, may in the coming days see the imposition of a Merchant Discount Rate or MDR. Does that mean that people will have to pay a fee for UPI transactions? No.The government has clarified that UPI will continue to remain free for consumers and no transaction charges will be applicable to person-to-person payments. The government has also said that if an MDR is introduced in the future it will only be applicable to a limited category of merchant transactions with the rate being nominal and much lower than the MDR currently applicable on credit or debit card transactions.We reported last week that a threshold of Rs 2,000 is being considered with a possible MDR of 0.25% to 0.4%. This means that routine transactions like milk, vegetables and groceries will not come under this charge.What is a Merchant Discount Rate? How is it currently applicable on credit or debit cards and why is it being proposed for UPI transactions? Who will pay the final cost of the MDR for UPI transactions?

What is MDR and how the system currently works for credit cards

Let’s first understand what is Merchant Discount Rate:Merchant Discount Rate is essentially a fee that a merchant who is selling goods or services has to pay to accept payments that are made through credit cards or debit cards. The fee is usually a certain percentage of the transaction value and is deducted by the bank before the merchant receives the final payment.According to Vivek Iyer, Partner and Financial Services Risk Advisory Leader, Grant Thornton Bharat, MDR for credit cards comprises three components – interchange fee (which is paid to the card issuer bank), network/switching fee (which is paid to the card settlement provider like Visa/Master/Amex ) and to the acquirer bank (that onboard the merchant).

Understanding MDR

What is MDR & how it works

Let’s understand this better with an example:You buy something for Rs 10,000 and make the payment through your credit card. Let’s say a 2% MDR is applicable – which means the Merchant Discount Rate is Rs 200. While you pay Rs 10,000, the merchant receives only Rs 9,800, with the Rs 200 deducted as MDR.This Rs 200 is distributed between the three mentioned above with the largest going to the interchange fee and lowest going to the card settlement provider, says Vivek Iyer.Also Read | No charges for UPI users: Government clarifies person-to-person transactions to remain free; top points

Why MDR is being proposed for UPI

The government has said that the proposed amendment to the Payment and Settlement Systems Act aims to make the UPI ecosystem financially sustainable. This is because the transaction volumes are growing, requiring continued investment in infrastructure, cybersecurity and fraud prevention.A self-sustaining revenue model would help support competition and future expansion.RBI governor Sanjay Malhotra has said that the cost is already being paid indirectly by the economy.“Now, costs have to be paid by someone — it’s a public [good]; we all want this particular infrastructure to continue to strengthen, become more efficient. That’s our focus as of now — let’s watch how developments proceed,” Malhotra said last week.“…Please keep in mind that ultimately it is the consumer, in some way or the other, who is already paying it – it may not be the same consumer, it may be the general economy, and you don’t get to see it directly, but it’s already happening in some form,” he said.Ranadurjay Talukdar, Partner and Payments Sector Leader, EY India points out that credit or debit cards and UPI sit on very different cost structures today.“On credit cards, MDR is unregulated and can run up to about 3% of the transaction value, largely because banks and payment networks carry fraud, rewards and chargeback costs,” he tells TOI.

RBI governor's statement

What RBI governor said on UPI

Non-RuPay debit is capped at 0.40% (max 200) for transactions in small merchants with less than Rs 20 lakh in annual turnover and 0.90% (max 1000) for large merchants with turnover above 20 lakhs. Rupay debit cards have zero MDR, much like UPI.UPI, by contrast, has been mandated to carry no MDR since the government’s zero-MDR push, with the small MDR that existed pre-2020 (up to 0.30% on person-to-merchant transactions) removed in January 2020 to accelerate adoption.“That’s the structural gap the current amendment is trying to address: UPI has scaled to 2,366 crore transactions worth Rs 29.9 lakh crore in July 2026 alone without a revenue stream funding the banks and fintechs that play a critical role to run the rails,” he tells TOI.Also Read | Will you have to pay to use UPI? 7 FAQs on possible MDR and what it means for consumers answered

Who pays the final cost?

Merchants. Experts note that even for credit and debit cards the cost is borne by merchants, though some can pass it on as a convenience charge.“RBI rules bar merchants from passing it (MDR) directly onto customers. In practice, though, the fee is usually absorbed by the merchant, though some pass it through as a convenience charge, and where it isn’t itemised, it tends to get folded into pricing,” Ranadurjay Talukdar of EY India tells TOI.“The government has said that consumers won’t face any transaction charges on UPI, and all P2P and P2PM transfers stay free. And the government has said it would be threshold-based, apply to a limited set of merchant transactions, and sit below card MDRs. So direct pass-through to consumers is meant to be structurally blocked, the same way it’s technically restricted on cards today,” Talukdar says.“The final decision on whether and how much MDR gets applied sits with the NPCI-led UPI and Services Steering Committee, so the specifics are still being worked out. The challenge will be in implementation by acquiring banks and PAs, given incorrect reporting of merchant turnover and issues around MCC misclassification, which need to be corrected,” he adds.

UPI MDR

UPI Charges: What Changes & What Doesn’t

Mihir Gandhi, Partner and Leader – Fintech and Payments Transformation, PwC India says that if the proposed pricing of MDR on UPI is introduced for large value merchants and for higher value transactions, then it is expected that the merchant will bear the cost of MDR on UPI (as they are anyways factoring in the MDR cost of cards) and this cost is expected to be lower than the MDR cost of cards.But Vivek Iyer of Grant Thornton Bharat believes that since merchants play in a competitive market, the ability to increase prices is limited. “Hence we don’t believe that costs are indirectly included by merchants in the product costs,” he says.For non-Rupay debit cards the MDR is RBI capped and for Rupay Debit Cards MDR is zero since January 2020 to drive digital payment adoption.“When MDR is introduced on UPI, we expect the merchants to largely adopt the same practice as they adopt for debit cards, as that is a surrogate closer to UPI,” he adds.

What FM Sitharaman has said:

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has sought to assure consumers that UPI transactions will continue to be free of them. She clarified that the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill does not provide for any tax or transaction fee on UPI payments.She has said if an MDR is introduced in the future, it would only be for transactions above a set threshold.Who will decide the applicability of MDR? The UPI Services Steering Committee, chaired by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI). The committee will examine whether an MDR should be introduced and if so what should be its scope and structure.

FM Sitharaman's statement

What FM Sitharaman has clarified

“Will consumers pay any UPI charge? No,” Sitharaman said in the Rajya Sabha. “UPI has remained free for consumers since its launch and every Indian will continue to make this instant digital without paying any transaction charge,” Sitharaman said.According to Sitharaman, financial inclusion and protecting small businesses remain a priority and consumers will not have to pay any fee for day-to-day routine low value transactions.What the amendment does is provide the government with the legal authority to change the existing zero-MDR framework that currently governs UPI and RuPay transactions. As of now, banks and payment system providers are not allowed to impose any direct or indirect charges on payments that are made via UPI or RuPay debit cards.



Source link

Centre likely to send FCRA Bill to JPC amid opposition | India News


Centre likely to send FCRA Bill to JPC amid opposition

NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to send the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) Amendment Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed scrutiny, amid objections from Christian representatives and opposition parties, news agency ANI reported citing sources.The Bill, introduced in the Lok Sabha on March 25, seeks to amend the FCRA, 2010, which regulates the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contributions by individuals, associations and companies in India.Although the Bill has not yet been listed for consideration and passage in the Lok Sabha, the government had earlier indicated that it could be taken up on August 12.According to sources, Christian representatives met Union home minister Amit Shah and sought either withdrawal of the Bill or its referral to a JPC, citing concerns over its provisions.The development follows a meeting between Mizoram chief minister Lalduhoma and Shah, during which the chief minister raised regional concerns and submitted recommendations on the proposed legislation. Lalduhoma was accompanied by Reverend John Raldosanga, chairman of the Mizoram Kohhran Hruaitu Committee (MKHC), and Reverend Lalhmangaiha, general secretary of the Council of Churches in Mizoram (CCM).“The only thing that is very clearly mentioned to us is that it’s not going to be retrospective. That assurance was given to us, and the rest of the points will be given a paragraph-wise comment by him… the discussion on the 12th of this month in Parliament,” Lalduhoma had said.Separately, a delegation led by DMK leader P Wilson met Shah and submitted a memorandum raising concerns that the proposed legislation “impacts religious minorities and civil society”.The delegation also flagged provisions including Section 14B and Chapter IIIA, arguing that delays on the FCRA Online Portal or minor technical non-compliances could lead to automatic cessation of registration and trigger the provisional or permanent vesting of assets with a state-notified Designated Authority.A major proposed change is the creation of a Designated Authority to oversee foreign contributions and assets belonging to organisations whose FCRA registration is cancelled, surrendered or ceases to remain valid.Under the proposed provisions, an organisation losing its FCRA registration would initially have its foreign contributions and assets vested provisionally with the Designated Authority. If its registration is restored or renewed within the prescribed period, the assets and unused foreign funds would be returned. Otherwise, the assets could vest permanently with the authority.The Bill also provides for cessation of an FCRA certificate following its expiry, non-renewal or refusal of renewal, including in cases where an organisation becomes defunct or its registration ceases.For assets such as places of worship, the proposed law requires the Designated Authority to preserve their religious character. It also provides for revision and judicial appeal against orders issued by the authority.The Bill proposes changes to the penalty framework as well, including reducing the maximum imprisonment for violations from five years to one year. It further proposes that state agencies obtain prior approval from the Centre before launching investigations under the FCRA.

Share your thoughts in the comments